Marmaduke
by Brad
Anderson
analyzed by
David Malki ! of www.wondermark.com
In
a recent interview, Marmaduke's
Brad
Anderson dropped hints as to his legacy:
"Hank Ketcham died a couple years ago, but he had two guys in training,
and you can’t tell the difference. And he always had writers. He had
quite a big staff. I don’t have any staff, except my wife, who takes
care of the office."
Anderson, born in 1924, started cartooning at the age of 15. In
1954 Marmaduke began
appearing in newspapers. The mischievous Great Dane has sold over
10 million copies of his over two dozen books. It's currently featured
in 500 newspapers in over 20 countries.
Anderson must awake each morning terrified. There's no one else.
There's no Marmaduke heir.
The dog will die with him.
He must keep living -- if only to keep Marmaduke alive. Because
that dog is all that brings meaning to his life. It's all the
success he has ever known.
In my local newspaper, the crappy square strips -- Marmaduke, Heathcliff, Dennis the Menace, and Family Circus -- all
appear together, in a sort of matrix of suckitude. Occasionally they
synergize; one may inadvertently comment on another, or illuminate an
unseen facet of an issue raised by another. Each of the four
consistently deals subtextually with deep-seated social neuroses --
with Dennis it's the fear of
abandonment; Heathcliff addresses
post-violent-victimhood paranoia; and Family
Circus is racist. (More on these in future articles.)
But Marmaduke is uniquely
psychosexual; the dog is a huge, lumbering id waving its monster
lipstick-phallus throughout the tightly-buttoned Winslow household
while tension simmers just below the surface:

Marmaduke the dog is
the rape fantasy taken flesh; he is the overpowering force that
conquers your will and thus leaves you inculpable. You physically cannot resist; therefore you are
absolved of responsibility. It is not your fault. (The tacit
implication is that you are then free to enjoy it guiltlessly.)
However, brutalizing rape is socially unacceptable behavior. It's
excused because he's a dog, but it's not condoned. He is a force that
can only be vectored, not contained, but civil society must at least do
their best to try and
harness his surging energy. Thus the Winslows and their hapless
neighbors must discourage Marmaduke's advances whenever possible:

However, there is a clear difference between what society must openly
condemn and what may be illicitly enjoyed behind closed doors. Anderson
delights in dancing across this line with the character of Dottie
Winslow (the wife and mother). Marmaduke is several times larger than
her husband, Phil; in terms of testosterone energy per pound Marmaduke
is a pure dynamo:

And so Anderson explores this relationship between the unfulfilled
housewife and the sexual beast that lives with her family. When
Phil is at work, and the children at school, she is alone with
him. Are her needs as a woman being met by her husband? Did
she marry for love, or for convenience? Did she, in fact, settle
down too early? Anderson hints at a longing buried deep in her
psyche.

But whatever she feels, she is part of society. She cannot act.
Anderson has filled Dottie's world with people to whom her desires are
monstrous. Each day, she walks a tenuous balancing act between
propriety and fulfillment; a razor-thin line separates her fragile
doll's house and a cathartic loosening of every inhibition that would
allow her to feel, even just once, what it would be like to live.
It is a line she must not cross.

In his comic strip, Anderson has created a model of the human
condition. The Marmaduke-id and the Phil/society-superego combat each
other in the person of the Dottie-ego. To function perfectly in the
artifice of society, Anderson asserts, we must become a neutral party
to our own desires; conversely, to give in to our innate selves is to
reject the mores and codes of the constructed world that sustains our
shallow life.
Cruelly, Marmaduke himself is not party to Dottie's torment. He is ever
present, ever willing, should she ever decide to give in and fall into
her own infinity. He's ready to go anytime; however, human
society in the aggregate --
Phil, for example, personifying the "rules" -- cannot allow humans in
the singular to experience
the depths of all that they might.
This is the joke that mankind has pulled on itself.

To Anderson's credit, when his contemporaries have all passed on their
mantles and died, he clings to his creation, his mankind-in-microcosm,
and tempts us with the challenging possibilities of what man might
someday become. In the same interview cited above, Anderson describes
his creative process:
"I think like a dog, and that helps a lot."
Anderson has opened himself to that id, that release to instinct and
desire and carnal pleasure. Anderson beckons us temptingly from the
other side of the rainbow. But Anderson knows that the "rules" are what
keep us together. Maximal individual fulfillment on a global scale
would lead to chaos, depriving us of infrastructural elements we need
to survive. So it's a trade-off: to live, to be able to buy food and
homes and blankets and trinkets, we must die a little. We must shut
away our ravenous base natures and contribute to the homogenous general
good. No matter how painful on a personal level, for the sake of
society, we must not allow
the Marmaduke-id primacy:

The problem is, while Marmaduke lends
itself readily to textual analysis, it's never very funny, and it is,
after all, a comic strip. It's always about a big dog climbing on
things or being awkward or being annoying, and there are about three
jokes in that concept, and Anderson's been doing them over and over for
fifty-one years. From the same interview:
"And, of course, dogs do the same thing over and over, but if you
follow them around, they do it a little bit differently every time. So
that’s what I try to do."
This is great for little-old-lady-with-her-morning-tea comicstrippery
(while the coal-black spark in her inmost being is fanned, perhaps,
into a wan but unrecognized flame) but bad for our hip, ironic,
post-postmodern cynical times.
The problem is that the flaw lies not as much in the writing of each
individual strip as it does in the underlying concept. But, in
keeping with the spirit, I will rewrite the above strip (Marmaduke on
the throne) for today's audience:
Caption: "Children, you
won't believe me now, but you'll thank me later -- no matter what's
he's told you, all authority on heaven and earth has not been given unto him."
Until next time ... I'll see you in the funny papers.
-- July, 2005
|