<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Stuff: Is polygamy a success?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wondermark.com/is-polygamy-a-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wondermark.com/is-polygamy-a-success/</link>
	<description>An Illustrated Jocularity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 12:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://wondermark.com/is-polygamy-a-success/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrapsofcrap.com/is-polygamy-a-success/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>This topic intersects the prospect of &quot;Cuckold,&quot; in my opinion. If a person needs an infinite value of combinations/permutations for amusement, perhaps he can find such treasures in a promiscuous, insatiable wife. Just discussing polygamy, I&#039;m already touching masochism. I think the public is bored with the ideal of a monogamous wife docile to a revered patriarch. So, pologamy fits right in with the female &#039;species&#039; as the public seems to further embrace the wanton. Feminism is growing in popularity.

Strange their isn&#039;t a Mormon Snow White duchess married to seven dwarfs? With the proliferation of penis enlargement pills, I wonder why penis reduction haven&#039;t been introduced? There is already breast reduction; I&#039;m not covering sex change, please! Just for those so cursed to be well endowed can never enjoy the best benefits of cuckolding, they can buy the &quot;penis evaporator&quot; at Walgreens. Then, when they feel inferior, take the &quot;penis enlargement.&quot;

Women could take &quot;clitoris enlargement&quot; and make more permutations.

Note, I am a man, not a femme posing as a stud. Hope this post isn&#039;t inappropriate. It&#039;s quite stressful continually minimizing the window as my female boss walks by.


Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic intersects the prospect of &#8220;Cuckold,&#8221; in my opinion. If a person needs an infinite value of combinations/permutations for amusement, perhaps he can find such treasures in a promiscuous, insatiable wife. Just discussing polygamy, I&#8217;m already touching masochism. I think the public is bored with the ideal of a monogamous wife docile to a revered patriarch. So, pologamy fits right in with the female &#8216;species&#8217; as the public seems to further embrace the wanton. Feminism is growing in popularity.</p>
<p>Strange their isn&#8217;t a Mormon Snow White duchess married to seven dwarfs? With the proliferation of penis enlargement pills, I wonder why penis reduction haven&#8217;t been introduced? There is already breast reduction; I&#8217;m not covering sex change, please! Just for those so cursed to be well endowed can never enjoy the best benefits of cuckolding, they can buy the &#8220;penis evaporator&#8221; at Walgreens. Then, when they feel inferior, take the &#8220;penis enlargement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Women could take &#8220;clitoris enlargement&#8221; and make more permutations.</p>
<p>Note, I am a man, not a femme posing as a stud. Hope this post isn&#8217;t inappropriate. It&#8217;s quite stressful continually minimizing the window as my female boss walks by.</p>
<p>Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.064 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 260/262 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via wondermark.com

Served from: wondermark.com @ 2012-05-22 08:50:04 -->
